- This topic has 5 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by
.
-
Topic
-
For everyone who has been calling for the GM and Chrysler to stop just accepting money without results, here is your answer.
Obama questions viability of GM, Chrysler
Quote:WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama asserted unprecedented government control over the auto industry Monday, bluntly rejecting turnaround plans by General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC, demanding fresh concessions for long-term federal aid and raising the possibility of quick bankruptcy for either ailing auto giant.Obama took the extraordinary step of announcing the government will back new car warranties issued by both GM and Chrysler, an attempt to reassure consumers their U.S.-made purchases will be protected even if the companies don’t survive.
“I am absolutely committed to working with Congress and the auto companies to meet one goal: The United States of America will lead the world in building the next generation of clean cars,” Obama said in his first extended remarks on the industry since taking office nearly 10 weeks ago. And yet, he added, “our auto industry is not moving in the right direction fast enough to succeed.”
Obama, flanked by several administration officials at the White House, announced a short-term infusion of cash for both firms, and said it might be the last for either.
Chrysler, judged by the administration as too small to survive, got 30 days’ worth of funds to complete a partnership with Fiat SpA, the Italian manufacturer, or some other automaker.
GM got assurances of 60 days’ worth of federal financing to try and revise its turnaround plan under new management with heavy government participation. The administration engineered the ouster of longtime CEO Rick Wagoner over the weekend, an indication of its deep involvement in an industry that once stood as a symbol of American capitalism.
Obama’s announcement underscored the extent to which automakers have been added to the list of large corporations now operating under a level of government control that seemed unthinkable less than a year ago. Since last fall, the Bush and Obama administrations, often acting in concert with the Federal Reserve, have engineered the takeover of housing titans Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, seized a large stake in several banks and installed a new CEO at bailed-out insurance giant American International Group.
The latest addition to the list, the once-proud auto industry, has struggled with foreign competition for more than a generation, then was further battered by the recession and credit crisis gripping the economy. Obama said 400,000 industry jobs have been lost in the past year alone, many in Michigan.
Fritz Henderson, newly named as CEO of General Motors, issued a statement saying the company would work “to make the fundamental and lasting changes necessary to reinvent GM for the long term.”
Chrysler Chairman Bob Nardelli sought to assure customers, dealers, suppliers and employees that the automaker “will operate ’business as usual’ over the next 30 days,” while working closely with the government and Fiat to secure the support of stakeholders.
Sergio Marchionne, CEO of Fiat, issued a statement calling the Obama administration’s involvement “tough but fair, and we believe we will arrive at a result that will establish a credible future for this crucial industrial sector and that assigns the right priority to the repayment of U.S. taxpayers’ funds.”
Fiat executives have talked to administration officials about a proposal to acquire a 35 percent stake in Chrysler in exchange for small car technology, transmissions and other items that Chrysler has valued at $8-$10 billion.
There was no immediate response from the United AutoWorkers Union, which will be pressured to make additional wage and benefit concessions under Obama’s demand for a revised restructuring plan. One worker, Don Thompson, 56, of Chesterfield Township in Michigan, said automakers were being punished because of public anger over the banking bailout. “They’re using us for the mistakes they’ve made in Washington,” he said.
…
-
Replies
-
I never thought I would see the day when our government would literally tell a business CEO to resign or get fired. Communism, I say, communism!!! It’s around the corner. Along with cap and trade, this will kill American business and our freedoms. Buy your weapons now.
All sides are losers in this. The government did not want to put money into GM and Chrysler. The companies themselves are the ones pleading with the government to not let them go into bankruptcy. The retired Auto workers will be losers no matter what happens.
lordairgtar wrote:
Quote:I never thought I would see the day when our government would literally tell a business CEO to resign or get fired. Communism, I say, communism!!! It’s around the corner. Along with cap and trade, this will kill American business and our freedoms. Buy your weapons now.Socialism at its finest. I can’t wait for 2012.
American Leyland anyone?
I’d like to see GM and Chrysler get threw this, restructure and pay off the LOANS they got to keep alive during a financial mess they didn’t create.
Both are still viable, sorry Obama, Toyota and Honda aren’t going to build your tanks if hell opens up and we have another World War.
lilwillie wrote:
Quote:American Leyland anyone?I’d like to see GM and Chrysler get threw this, restructure and pay off the LOANS they got to keep alive during a financial mess they didn’t create.
Both are still viable, sorry Obama, Toyota and Honda aren’t going to build your tanks if hell opens up and we have another World War.
Yes, all one has to do is look at the British auto industry during the 70s and 80. Austin and Morris were pretty much stalled as far as new product and innovation. Anyone remember the Austin Marina/Allegro?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.